Sarah Palin appears more and more like a comic book heroine as the months march on. She has a common foe that is constantly attacking her from both sides of the spectrum; the Establishment. The evil establishment has been sitting, rotting in the pits of the DC beltway. Those who enter this black-hole, leave without morals, standards, common sense, or dignity. Many are mutated into something they never intended to become. Many pump their faces full of botox, insert hair plugs, lie for the sake of lying, or for the sake of money and power. These political villains ooze corruption and their struggle has been finding the kryptonite to finally do in this heroine that manages to enact change via a keyboard and a social media platform: Facebook.
The beltway pundits like Krauthammer, i.e. elitist neocons, pounce on this woman and treat her as some kind of joke. Also, take for example, the insiders at the NRSC, who wrote her off, and instead asked Newt Gingrich to speak at their event. Even though she wasn’t the headliner at the event the start of it quickly became about her, just ask the crowd inside.
The DNC attacks her as the next radical, religious zealot conservative, although she is a major proponent of the constitution and states’ rights, and does not believe in forcing her beliefs on others. The libs fear her and can’t stop talking about her even outside town hall events in Towson, Maryland.
If Sarah Palin was such a non-entity and was no threat to the establishment or the powers that be in Washington, why is she still given so much face time and why is every single statement she makes on Facebook picked apart?
It’s quite simple: This woman is the future and she is a threat. She represents what I have been wanting to see out of politics for a very long time. She is an average individual who has made it up through the ranks with only God, family, and herself to thank. She has gotten ahead by hard work and progressing one step at a time in a cut-throat political world. The founding fathers had envisioned a government that would be run by the people, for the people, and not by career politicians that treated their constituents like peasants, believing they were part of the next plutocracy/oligarchy/political dynasty. Sarah Palin is the type of person who is not beholden to the special interests, the lobbyists, the political back-scratching and corruption that is so rampant in our government. The Messiah of ‘Hope and Change,’ currently occupying the White House, can’t even compare to the standards Sarah Palin has set and what it is she exemplifies.
You may not like Sarah Palin, but you cannot say she isn’t a force to be reckoned with.
I’ll put it out there now, I am a big Sarah Palin fan, I have been since that fateful day at the end of August. I will never forget where I was and when I saw her introduced: I was actually working out at the gym, running on the treadmill of the Mandalay Bay Resort in Vegas, doing a fist bump into the air. For the first time in my female adult life I was enthused by a politician and actually believed in them. I could tell that this woman was the genuine article and respected her for that fact alone. Every blow she made to Obama during her RNC convention speech was just one more time I was jumping out of my chair clapping, and confirming that this woman is the future of politics.
I do not believe that a person must have a specific degree to be able to run a business, a school, or a country. I find liberal ivy league elitists lacking in wisdom. I don’t want to make a generalization here, but most who have graduated from a top school known for its academics, excel in knowledge, book smarts, and theory, but try applying that to the real world. What happened to real life trial and error or insight? Wisdom is not gained through books, it’s gained through life experience. Sarah Palin has experienced much in her adult life, and her career. She has had to work hard to make ends meet and even put herself through school. Let’s think for a moment about those who have been born into privilege or have had their schooling paid for, whether through family, friends or a Saudi acquaintance… Do they appreciate their education and the effort/money it took to get it? Or does the individual who had to scrimp and save to make it just another year appreciate it that much more? Does the person who had to save understand what it means to not spend beyond your means or does the silver spoon, political wanna-be?
It’s no coincidence that those who came from ivy league schools have gotten us into some of the biggest messes this country has seen. Take for example Jimmy Carter, the genius, he made things so bad they had to create a new economic term; stagflation. If you don’t see the parallels between him and the next coming of the messiah, the genius from Columbia and Harvard Law, you are fooling yourself. And what about the liberals who call Bush a dummy? Well didn’t he come from Yale? Don’t use the excuse that you need an ivy league degree to manage a country. I have seen businesses come and go and some of the most successful companies have been built from the ground up by college and high school drop-outs. Ronald Reagan was no ‘ivy leaguer’ and he turned our economy completely around. He studied economics at a small school and became a ‘B’ actor, something he was later made fun of for as well as his affinity for mac n’ cheese!
Sarah Palin’s recent statements have been concise and have hit through to the heart of the matter. She is the only member of the GOP, besides DeMint, Bachmann, and a handful of others who are true conservatives, unabashedly, unapologetic for calling a spade a spade.
At first, I too, thought death panels could just be a metaphor for what the end of life counseling and bureaucracy would become, but upon further investigation into the section, there is much to be said for the candor behind Mrs. Palin’s statement. The provision in the bill was so incredibly vague that fear and caution should have been the common sentiment among those reading the bill. Many times these convoluted bills are written in such ways that nobody can understand the legalese. The bills are passed, and only later, do representatives realize there were too many loopholes in the first place. There is a reason why that provision was taken out of the bill after Sarah Palin doubled down on her death panel statement.
Sarah Palin has continued to blast Obama and the liberal policies that are being concocted in DC. She recently made a statement regarding Obama’s off-shore drilling and oil funding hypocrisy. George Soros and Goldman Sachs have had plenty of influence on the company that Obama just gave $2B to – Petrobras. Sarah Palin made the following statement:
Why is it that during these tough times, when we have great needs at home, the Obama White House is prepared to send more than two billion of your hard-earned tax dollars to Brazil so that the nation’s state-owned oil company, Petrobras, can drill off shore and create jobs developing its own resources? That’s all Americans want; but such rational energy development has been continually thwarted by rabid environmentalists, faceless bureaucrats and a seemingly endless parade of lawsuits aimed at shutting down new energy projects.
I’ll speak for the talent I have personally witnessed on the oil fields in Alaska when I say no other country in the world has a stronger workforce than America, no other country in the world has better safety standards than America, and no other country in the world has stricter environmental standards than America. Come to Alaska to witness how oil and gas can be developed simultaneously with the preservation of our eco-system. America has the resources. We deserve the opportunity to develop our resources no less than the Brazilians. Millions of Americans know it is true: “Drill, baby, drill.” Alaska is proof you can drill and develop, and preserve nature, with its magnificent caribou herds passing by the Trans Alaska Pipeline System (TAPS), completely unaffected. One has to wonder if Obamais playing politics and perhaps refusing a “win” for some states just to play to the left with our money.
Buy American is a wonderful slogan, but you can’t say in one breath that you want to strengthen our economy and stimulate it, and then in another ship our much-needed dollars to a nation desperate to drill while depriving us of the same opportunity.
Sarah Palin’s latest ‘take Obama to task’ moment occurred earlier today when she asked a question that many of us conservatives have been asking. Why no tort reform? I would think that we should fix the known problems that are smaller before tackling an entire system by overhauling it. Tort reform is another lucrative business for the lobbyists, but those on the left conveniently forget that the liberal lobbyists are just as bad as the supposed ‘conservative’ lobbyists they love to demonize. We have learned, however, that the evil insurance company lobbyists like PhRMA are actually on Obama’s dole as well. The trial lawyer’s lobby, i.e. ABA, has had significant pull on Capitol Hill for years, and you can expect that they will not be mentioned by many of the politicians because most of them are probably old law school chums.
If anybody knows about tort reform and a loser pays law, it would be Sarah Palin. She saw, this past year, how a law that was intended for the right reasons, can be used and abused by partisan ideologues. If Alaska had a loser pays law her ethics complaint issues would have been null and void.
First, we cannot have health care reform without tort reform. The two are intertwined. For example, one supposed justification for socialized medicine is the high cost of health care. As Dr. Scott Gottlieb recently noted, “If Mr. Obama is serious about lowering costs, he’ll need to reform the economic structures in medicine—especially programs like Medicare.”  Two examples of these “economic structures” are high malpractice insurance premiums foisted on physicians (and ultimately passed on to consumers as “high health care costs”) and the billions wasted on defensive medicine.
Dr. Stuart Weinstein, with the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, recently explained the problem:
”The medical liability crisis has had many unintended consequences, most notably a decrease in access to care in a growing number of states and an increase in healthcare costs.
Access is affected as physicians move their practices to states with lower liability rates and change their practice patterns to reduce or eliminate high-risk services. When one considers that half of all neurosurgeons—as well as one third of all orthopedic surgeons, one third of all emergency physicians, and one third of all trauma surgeons—are sued each year, is it any wonder that 70 percent of emergency departments are at risk because they lack available on-call specialist coverage?” 
Dr. Weinstein makes good points, points completely ignored by President Obama. Dr. Weinstein details the costs that our out-of-control tort system are causing the health care industry and notes research that “found that liability reforms could reduce defensive medicine practices, leading to a 5 percent to 9 percent reduction in medical expenditures without any effect on mortality or medical complications.”
Read more from Sarah’s facebook page here.
This woman is leading the charge and the debate and she hasn’t even made any major public appearances since she stepped down from being Governor of Alaska. She has simply written her opinions on her facebook page, and the political world, as well as the media, is once again, all aflutter.
You cannot tell me that this Conservative woman from Alaska is not a threat or a superstar.